Skip to main content

Media

You deserve
honest news.

The government defunded public broadcasting. It threatened to pull TV networks' licenses over critical coverage. It turned Voice of America into a propaganda channel. A free press is not a luxury. It is how citizens hold power to account. We have to build it back.

The Crisis in Numbers

The news system is broken by design.

Public broadcasting lost its funding. The FCC became a political weapon. The people who lose most are those with no other option.

$1.1B

in Corporation for Public Broadcasting funding rescinded by Congress in 2025 - forcing CPB to dissolve entirely on January 6, 2026

1,300→100

Voice of America staff cut from 1,300 to fewer than 100 employees - gutting service to 280 million people across 47 languages

2,500+

Local newspapers closed since 2005 - leaving communities with no local accountability journalism and no commercial replacement

1,108

FCC rules eliminated under FCC Chairman Carr's "Delete, Delete, Delete" initiative - 90 years of public interest protections gone

Why This Happened

The government weaponized the airwaves.

Project 2025 was clear. It wanted the FCC to stop being an independent watchdog. It wanted the FCC to be a tool of presidential power. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr wrote Project 2025's FCC chapter himself. Trump named him chairman on January 20, 2025. He went to work on the blueprint right away. He opened probes into ABC, NBC, and CBS. He threatened to revoke broadcast licenses over coverage the administration called unfair. Then Paramount asked for merger approval. The FCC stalled the review. At the same time, Trump's lawyers worked out a $16 million payment to Trump's future presidential library. That is not regulation. That is extortion, with a federal license as the lever.

Public broadcasting was a named target. Project 2025 called for CPB to be "privatized or eliminated." In May 2025, Trump signed an executive order. It told CPB to stop funding PBS and NPR. Congress then took back $1.1 billion. That money was two years of advance funding. Congress had set it aside to shield CPB from exactly this kind of political attack. By January 6, 2026, the CPB board had voted to shut CPB down. CPB had backed public broadcasting since 1967. About 170 public TV stations and hundreds of public radio stations lost their main federal support overnight.

Voice of America served 280 million people in 47 languages. It was torn down from the inside. Kari Lake was put in charge of USAGM. She had no journalism or management background. Her only credential was loyalty to the president. She cut the staff from 1,300 to fewer than 100. She cut the agency from 49 language services to four. She partnered with One America News Network to supply content. In January 2026, she went on VOA's Persian-language service herself to deliver pro-Trump promotional content. That broke the legal editorial firewall at 22 U.S.C. § 6202(b). An agency required by law to deliver honest, independent news was used to send domestic political propaganda to Iranian audiences.

This is what happens when the government sees the press as a threat instead of a check on power. The institutions destroyed in 2025 and 2026 took decades to build. Rebuilding them is a constitutional duty. So is hardening them against the next attack.

What Project 2025 Did to Media

  • Used FCC merger review as political leverage. Paramount paid $16 million to Trump's presidential library fund to get its media merger cleared.
  • Dissolved CPB and defunded PBS and NPR. Rural towns, tribal radio stations, and low-income families were left with no public broadcasting at all.
  • Cut Voice of America from 1,300 staff to fewer than 100. That abandoned 280 million people who relied on it for uncensored news in authoritarian countries.
  • Ended net neutrality. ISPs can now throttle streaming, sell paid "fast lanes," and favor their own content over independent journalism.
  • Ended rules for children's educational programming. Ended local ownership caps. Ended broadband privacy rules that protected subscribers' browsing data.

The Plan

What Project 2029 proposes.

Based on Chapter 8 (FCC, CPB, USAGM) of Project 2029. Specific bills. Real legal authority. A plan that can actually pass.

1

FCC Independence and License Protection Act

The public airwaves cannot be a political weapon

Prohibit the FCC from initiating or threatening broadcast license revocation proceedings against any major network based on editorial content - requiring independent judicial review before any such proceeding may proceed. Codify FCC commissioner independence with for-cause removal protections. Reverse Carr's 'Delete, Delete, Delete' deregulation: restore children's educational programming requirements, diversity hiring standards, local ownership caps, and broadband consumer privacy rules that required ISPs to obtain opt-in consent before selling browsing data. Prohibit FCC merger review from being used as leverage in unrelated presidential litigation - a practice that constitutes extortion under any reasonable reading of the Administrative Procedure Act.

Legal Authority: Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq.); First Amendment; Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.); Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 395 U.S. 367 (1969)
2

Public Broadcasting Restoration and Protection Act

Rebuild CPB, PBS, and NPR - and make them impossible to defund by executive order

Re-establish the Corporation for Public Broadcasting with tripled federal funding - $1.5 billion annually, up from the pre-dissolution level of approximately $500 million. Authorize CPB on a 10-year forward-funding basis and prohibit executive rescission without a two-thirds congressional vote - closing the mechanism that allowed the $1.1 billion clawback. Establish a statutory Local Journalism Preservation Fund within CPB providing $500 million annually in grants to local news organizations, nonprofit newsrooms, and tribal radio stations. The United States currently spends approximately $1.40 per capita on public broadcasting annually; peer democracies average $60-$90. This is a choice, not a necessity.

Legal Authority: Public Broadcasting Act of 1967 (47 U.S.C. § 396); Article I spending power; Impoundment Control Act of 1974
3

Voice of America Independence Restoration Act

America's credibility abroad depends on honest journalism - not a propaganda channel

Rebuild USAGM and Voice of America to pre-2025 operational capacity: restore the workforce from fewer than 100 to at least 1,300 employees; restore service in all languages eliminated under Kari Lake's tenure; rescind the partnership with One America News Network. Codify the editorial firewall at 22 U.S.C. § 6202(b) with criminal penalties for any USAGM official who directs or influences the content of broadcasts - making a repeat of the January 2026 Persian-language propaganda incident prosecutable. Require Senate confirmation for the USAGM CEO and establish an independent bipartisan oversight board. Restore the visa program for foreign national journalists that formed the foundation of VOA's multilingual reporting capacity.

Legal Authority: U.S. International Broadcasting Act of 1994 (22 U.S.C. §§ 6201 et seq.); BBG Firewall Statute (22 U.S.C. § 6202(b)); VOA Charter
4

Net Neutrality Permanence Act

An open internet is not a privilege - it is infrastructure

Enact net neutrality through statute, permanently classifying broadband as a Title II telecommunications service - ending the cycle of FCC orders being vacated by courts applying post-Chevron statutory construction. Prohibit ISPs from throttling, blocking, or creating paid fast lanes for any lawful content. Restore FCC authority to enforce these rules without relying on rulemaking authority alone. The Sixth Circuit's 2025 vacatur of the Biden FCC's net neutrality order demonstrated that administrative rulemaking is insufficient - only a statute will hold. Without net neutrality, ISPs can slow down a competing news service, degrade a streaming platform that hasn't paid for priority treatment, or favor their own affiliated content over independent journalism.

Legal Authority: Communications Act (47 U.S.C. § 153); Commerce Clause; Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024)
5

Local Journalism Investment and Media Ownership Reform

Fund the reporters who cover your city council - and break up the monopolies that replaced them

Reinstate FCC media ownership rules gutted since 2017: restore the newspaper-broadcast cross-ownership prohibition, lower the national broadcast ownership cap from 39 percent to 25 percent of TV households, and prohibit any single entity from owning more than one television station in a single market. Require FCC to weigh diversity of ownership - including race, gender, and local ownership - in all license proceedings. Provide payroll tax credits of up to $25,000 per journalist annually for local news organizations with fewer than 50 editorial staff. Conduct an immediate review of all media mergers approved since 2017 for anticompetitive harm under the Sherman Act.

Legal Authority: Communications Act § 309(k); Sherman Antitrust Act (15 U.S.C. § 1); FTC Act § 5; Corporation for Public Broadcasting Act

Take Action

Fight for honest news.

The press cannot check power when power controls the press. Here is what you can do.

Support Local News

Subscribe to your local newspaper. Donate to nonprofit news organizations. A community without local journalism is a community without accountability - and there are 2,500 fewer of them than there were 20 years ago.

Find Local News →

Demand FCC Reform

Contact your congressional representatives. Ask them specifically to support the Public Broadcasting Restoration Act and to oppose any use of FCC licensing authority as political retaliation against news networks.

Find Your Rep →

Read Chapter 8

The full FCC, CPB, VOA, and USAGM reform blueprint - with every policy, legal authority, and implementation timeline.

Read the Plan →

Share This

Help others understand what's at stake.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

What does Project 2029 propose for media reform?
Project 2029's media reform plan includes: restoring FCC independence from political control; breaking up media monopolies using antitrust law to prevent any single company from owning broadcast, print, and digital outlets in the same market; rebuilding and expanding PBS and NPR funding to match BBC-level investment; fully restoring Voice of America and USAGM to editorial independence after political capture; reinstating the Fairness Doctrine requiring broadcast licensees to cover controversial public issues; and establishing a Local Journalism Restoration Act to fund local news.
How did Project 2025 target Voice of America and public media?
Project 2025 proposed politically capturing the US Agency for Global Media (USAGM) - the parent agency of Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Free Asia - by replacing the independent board with a single presidentially appointed director with direct editorial control. VOA's reporters had their broadcasts killed and replaced with pro-administration content. Project 2029 restores full editorial independence through statute, not just policy, making political interference a federal offense.
Would Project 2029 restore the Fairness Doctrine?
Project 2029 proposes a modernized Fairness Doctrine requiring broadcast licensees (who use public airwaves under federal license) to cover issues of public importance and present contrasting viewpoints. The original Fairness Doctrine was eliminated by the FCC in 1987. Project 2029's version updates it for modern media, applying it to broadcast and cable news, and establishing an independent enforcement mechanism separate from political appointees at the FCC.
What does Project 2029 propose to rebuild local journalism?
Local news has collapsed: 2,900 local newspapers have closed since 2005, leaving 70 million Americans in news deserts. Project 2029 proposes the Local Journalism Restoration Act providing tax credits for local news subscriptions, direct grants to non-profit local newsrooms, low-interest loans for employee ownership conversions of closing newspapers, and antitrust enforcement against tech platforms that profit from news content without compensating the publishers who produce it.